"The Polish plumbers are all in England, and the Ukrainian plumbers are all in Poland."
Fortunately for us, most of the tradesmen who've worked on our plumbing and heating systems are still around. Although many did indeed evacuate, many are coming back, or never left in the first place. My wife was able to have the wood-burning central heating system serviced, and a repair done to the electric backup system.
Yes, a very large portion of the refugees are women and children, but the flow back to Ukraine is nearly as large as the outward stream.
As you say, may things stay quiet. Hope to see you fairly soon!
Regarding the Azov stuff I recently commented on https://kanekoa.substack.com/p/ukrainian-neo-nazis-claim-they-beheaded?s=r. Truth is quite hard to come by but I agree with your assessment of the Azov troops as being quite anti-Russian and have been more that capable. We are besieged by propaganda.
The Daily Exposé is no more credible on COVID than it is on the Russian war on Ukraine. Drilling down a bit into its links and contributors reveals a self-referencing industry of misinformation. Holding the Exposé in regard as a source on COVID and in contempt on Russia demonstrates only confirmation bias.
If they are wrong, it has to be about something. Recent articles have presented statistics showing that in Australia, Canada, Scotland and elsewhere something like 4 out of 5 cases, hospitalizations and deaths are among the vaccinated. The more boosters, the worse it is. A useful rebuttal would be to say which articles are wrong and why.
Every article written draws on public data bases. There are no others available. Therefore, whatever problems there are would be misinterpretations of data. Every jurisdiction maintains similar statistics. Most analyses come to similar conclusions. Refuting them would require invalidating all of them, not just nit picking one or two.
I have not seen it attempted. I observe authorities ignoring such analyses. I obsere them offer their own carefully crafted statistics, which nay-sayers gleefully pick apart. But I don't see them directly attacking the studies cited by The Daily Expose.
The pages of https://igorchudov.substack.com/ and https://boriquagato.substack.com/ go into some length regarding the data. The vaccinated are now experiencing greater death rates particularly among the seniors. There are few seniors who haven't been vaccinated. The only real data is now inconvenient so the UK has stopped reporting. OTOH, we seniors 80+ already are closer to death having passed the average age of death.
Vaccines are not 100 percent effective. In highly vaccinated populations, there will be a higher *total* incidence of disease among the vaccinated — there are simply that many more of them. The relevant number is a "per capita by group." And using this, the unvaccinated are much more likely to contract the disease, be hospitalized, and die.
Yes, there are many more vaxxed than unvaxxed. The vaccination was supposed to keep people from getting sick, which it clearly doesn't.
On the basis of very extensive reading over two years, I believe that the vaccines are more dangerous than the disease. But at this point in time it is like arguing religion, which is never a good idea. You're vaxxed. I'm not. I use the ivermectin/zinc/vitamin prophylaxis, which is never even considered as a third alternative. I wish you luck with your choice.
Many Substack authors write on this topic. Metatron (Joel Smalley, Dead Man Talking) seems to take as global of a view as anybody. In today's post he provides a series of graphs, each presenting every country of the world for which data is available, plotting adverse outcomes against vaccinations given.
So far as I know The Daily Expose does not cite him, or vice versa. It seems to me that this is the analysis we need. The whole world, and all-cause mortality by vaccination status.
They publish a great deal on Covid, which tends to corroborate other experts such as Steve Kirsch, Peter McCullough and Robert Malone. Your caution would apply to just about any source. See how well what they are pushing compares with reality as you see it. Never rely excessively on any single source.
Kirsch is not an expert, though he believes passionately in his cause. He has had some success, especially with his own cancer treatment, and some failures, having lost his expert scientific team over his difficulty in understanding scientific methods. He may also have a tendency yoward narcissism, which makes him difficult to ignore.
McCullough and Malone (who was vaccinated) are legititmate scientists who disagree with the larger scientific community. I don't find it odd that there is disagreement. I also think an argument can be made that many Ivermectin studies are flawed in that they do not include zinc and other elements that may may them more effective. I've taken zinc, vitamin C and echinecia to combat corona viruses for years, and believe that cocktail to be extremely effective. I was at Stanford when Linus Pauling was unfairly pilloried for his Vit C recommendations.
That said, The Exposé is a rag that survives by fanning hysteria, and many if not most of its contributors are not as qualified as the three you mention (none of whom believe vaccines are "tagging" people, as far as I could determine) and many are part of a profitable "conspiracy industry." The Exposé is part of that industry that supports each node with references to more misinformation. Not credible. Not about Russia's attack on Ukraine, nor about COVID.
Just now another Expose article with links to more than 100 others. I could not keep up if I wanted.
https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/04/22/comprehensive-list-of-people-who-died-due-to-covid-vaccination/
"The Polish plumbers are all in England, and the Ukrainian plumbers are all in Poland."
Fortunately for us, most of the tradesmen who've worked on our plumbing and heating systems are still around. Although many did indeed evacuate, many are coming back, or never left in the first place. My wife was able to have the wood-burning central heating system serviced, and a repair done to the electric backup system.
Yes, a very large portion of the refugees are women and children, but the flow back to Ukraine is nearly as large as the outward stream.
As you say, may things stay quiet. Hope to see you fairly soon!
Regarding the Azov stuff I recently commented on https://kanekoa.substack.com/p/ukrainian-neo-nazis-claim-they-beheaded?s=r. Truth is quite hard to come by but I agree with your assessment of the Azov troops as being quite anti-Russian and have been more that capable. We are besieged by propaganda.
The Daily Exposé is no more credible on COVID than it is on the Russian war on Ukraine. Drilling down a bit into its links and contributors reveals a self-referencing industry of misinformation. Holding the Exposé in regard as a source on COVID and in contempt on Russia demonstrates only confirmation bias.
If they are wrong, it has to be about something. Recent articles have presented statistics showing that in Australia, Canada, Scotland and elsewhere something like 4 out of 5 cases, hospitalizations and deaths are among the vaccinated. The more boosters, the worse it is. A useful rebuttal would be to say which articles are wrong and why.
Every article written draws on public data bases. There are no others available. Therefore, whatever problems there are would be misinterpretations of data. Every jurisdiction maintains similar statistics. Most analyses come to similar conclusions. Refuting them would require invalidating all of them, not just nit picking one or two.
I have not seen it attempted. I observe authorities ignoring such analyses. I obsere them offer their own carefully crafted statistics, which nay-sayers gleefully pick apart. But I don't see them directly attacking the studies cited by The Daily Expose.
The pages of https://igorchudov.substack.com/ and https://boriquagato.substack.com/ go into some length regarding the data. The vaccinated are now experiencing greater death rates particularly among the seniors. There are few seniors who haven't been vaccinated. The only real data is now inconvenient so the UK has stopped reporting. OTOH, we seniors 80+ already are closer to death having passed the average age of death.
Vaccines are not 100 percent effective. In highly vaccinated populations, there will be a higher *total* incidence of disease among the vaccinated — there are simply that many more of them. The relevant number is a "per capita by group." And using this, the unvaccinated are much more likely to contract the disease, be hospitalized, and die.
Yes, there are many more vaxxed than unvaxxed. The vaccination was supposed to keep people from getting sick, which it clearly doesn't.
On the basis of very extensive reading over two years, I believe that the vaccines are more dangerous than the disease. But at this point in time it is like arguing religion, which is never a good idea. You're vaxxed. I'm not. I use the ivermectin/zinc/vitamin prophylaxis, which is never even considered as a third alternative. I wish you luck with your choice.
Many Substack authors write on this topic. Metatron (Joel Smalley, Dead Man Talking) seems to take as global of a view as anybody. In today's post he provides a series of graphs, each presenting every country of the world for which data is available, plotting adverse outcomes against vaccinations given.
So far as I know The Daily Expose does not cite him, or vice versa. It seems to me that this is the analysis we need. The whole world, and all-cause mortality by vaccination status.
https://metatron.substack.com/p/covid-requiem-aeternam?token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjoxOTc5ODk3LCJwb3N0X2lkIjo1MjU5ODk0NSwiXyI6InE3MXBqIiwiaWF0IjoxNjUwNzEzNTIzLCJleHAiOjE2NTA3MTcxMjMsImlzcyI6InB1Yi01NzkwODUiLCJzdWIiOiJwb3N0LXJlYWN0aW9uIn0.PFtD-vTSey7SeKB6Jl0bZ-1NSONF3Z4GUH7byZbSnDI&s=r
They publish a great deal on Covid, which tends to corroborate other experts such as Steve Kirsch, Peter McCullough and Robert Malone. Your caution would apply to just about any source. See how well what they are pushing compares with reality as you see it. Never rely excessively on any single source.
Kirsch is not an expert, though he believes passionately in his cause. He has had some success, especially with his own cancer treatment, and some failures, having lost his expert scientific team over his difficulty in understanding scientific methods. He may also have a tendency yoward narcissism, which makes him difficult to ignore.
McCullough and Malone (who was vaccinated) are legititmate scientists who disagree with the larger scientific community. I don't find it odd that there is disagreement. I also think an argument can be made that many Ivermectin studies are flawed in that they do not include zinc and other elements that may may them more effective. I've taken zinc, vitamin C and echinecia to combat corona viruses for years, and believe that cocktail to be extremely effective. I was at Stanford when Linus Pauling was unfairly pilloried for his Vit C recommendations.
That said, The Exposé is a rag that survives by fanning hysteria, and many if not most of its contributors are not as qualified as the three you mention (none of whom believe vaccines are "tagging" people, as far as I could determine) and many are part of a profitable "conspiracy industry." The Exposé is part of that industry that supports each node with references to more misinformation. Not credible. Not about Russia's attack on Ukraine, nor about COVID.