I so enjoy MAA. The badass article was quite extraordinary. As far as children and vaccines go, I cannot accept the risk/reward given the uncertainty about the mRNA technology long term. I'm not convinced enough data is at hand to assess safety. Pfizer's own materials suggest we are in unknown territory.
Regarding Russian winning. I have had an obvious piece of propaganda in response to something I had commented on. Starts off as "Bit correct sir , the Donbas is now cleared , it’s full of Russ Slavs as the nationalists refer to . Hence the Russians went steady , all sorted bar the dregs and they have been abandoned by west now , so no rush . " and goes on. Then "The last of these azov nazi guys are now in the steel factory and the Russians are not in a hurry as they don’t want to destroy the steel factory ." Of course, I have no idea if the steel factory has been preserved but you may. From other reporting Mariupol remains contested which is flat remarkable. If granny is using that AK-47 she picked up and is going to starve anyway, I do expect she will try to take many with her. Cornered animals generally fight pretty hard. In the end the bullets do run out and death arrives. Inhumanity itself.
Apr 8, 2022·edited Apr 8, 2022Liked by Graham Seibert
would someone explain to me what the vaccinators mean by their claims of, for instance: "81% effective against Omicron' (to quote from the above) ?
For if they mean that if 100 people take the vaccine and are exposed to the virus then 81% will neither die nor have a severe episode then that's even less 'protection' than the immune system gives without the vaccine isn't it?
But if they mean effective in protecting those who would have NOT been protected by the un artificially provoked immune system that doesn't seem to fit at all with the story as I've understood it so far. And it was a pretty simple story.
For the story was our immune systems protected us against covid to something like 99.4 %.
Pfizer put up a vaccine and published trial results and made claims and the absolute risk benefit was + 0.1% so that if everyone had taken it they then were protected to the tune of something like 99.6%
But here they're claiming not 0.1% but 81%. If we are to look at it that way.
So without the vaccines there were 0.6% who were NOT protected naturally.
And with it the claim was a margin of 0.4% not protected.
But this 81% claim is that 81% of that 0.6% are now protected?
Knocking the number down by roughly four fifths - down to 0.2%.
As for Unz, they've turned into disgusting Russian shills, most of their writers who touch upon the war in Ukraine are also writers for Strategic Culture, the Duginist outfit out of Moscow. If Russia had "won" the war, they'd have replaced Zelenskyy by now with a Russian puppet regime. As is, they threw in 150,000 troops and ended up with a stalemate, leaving their armored columns wrecked across the countryside, turning highways into junkyards. Let's hope for a similar result in Donbass, I'm sure the Unz people will find out a way to explain that one away, too.
And as for "Rebel Wisdom", it's neither "rebel" nor "wise"...
Never thought of myself as a badass but I got this one. Glad you are smarter than some of your followers on Covid. It pays, a lot, to look deeper than the surface on that subject.
Oh and I'm still not getting your emails when you post.
I am also a Badass which is probably why I have no friends and half my family hates me lol
I so enjoy MAA. The badass article was quite extraordinary. As far as children and vaccines go, I cannot accept the risk/reward given the uncertainty about the mRNA technology long term. I'm not convinced enough data is at hand to assess safety. Pfizer's own materials suggest we are in unknown territory.
Regarding Russian winning. I have had an obvious piece of propaganda in response to something I had commented on. Starts off as "Bit correct sir , the Donbas is now cleared , it’s full of Russ Slavs as the nationalists refer to . Hence the Russians went steady , all sorted bar the dregs and they have been abandoned by west now , so no rush . " and goes on. Then "The last of these azov nazi guys are now in the steel factory and the Russians are not in a hurry as they don’t want to destroy the steel factory ." Of course, I have no idea if the steel factory has been preserved but you may. From other reporting Mariupol remains contested which is flat remarkable. If granny is using that AK-47 she picked up and is going to starve anyway, I do expect she will try to take many with her. Cornered animals generally fight pretty hard. In the end the bullets do run out and death arrives. Inhumanity itself.
Mariupol today - mopping up my ass:
https://t.me/LastBP/7783?single
https://t.me/LastBP/7782?single
would someone explain to me what the vaccinators mean by their claims of, for instance: "81% effective against Omicron' (to quote from the above) ?
For if they mean that if 100 people take the vaccine and are exposed to the virus then 81% will neither die nor have a severe episode then that's even less 'protection' than the immune system gives without the vaccine isn't it?
But if they mean effective in protecting those who would have NOT been protected by the un artificially provoked immune system that doesn't seem to fit at all with the story as I've understood it so far. And it was a pretty simple story.
For the story was our immune systems protected us against covid to something like 99.4 %.
Pfizer put up a vaccine and published trial results and made claims and the absolute risk benefit was + 0.1% so that if everyone had taken it they then were protected to the tune of something like 99.6%
But here they're claiming not 0.1% but 81%. If we are to look at it that way.
So without the vaccines there were 0.6% who were NOT protected naturally.
And with it the claim was a margin of 0.4% not protected.
But this 81% claim is that 81% of that 0.6% are now protected?
Knocking the number down by roughly four fifths - down to 0.2%.
Is that what they're claiming?
That independent blogger comes across as a pharma salesperson, with pharma talking points, the same kind of misrepresentation as this: https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/propaganda-by-foot-soldier
As for Unz, they've turned into disgusting Russian shills, most of their writers who touch upon the war in Ukraine are also writers for Strategic Culture, the Duginist outfit out of Moscow. If Russia had "won" the war, they'd have replaced Zelenskyy by now with a Russian puppet regime. As is, they threw in 150,000 troops and ended up with a stalemate, leaving their armored columns wrecked across the countryside, turning highways into junkyards. Let's hope for a similar result in Donbass, I'm sure the Unz people will find out a way to explain that one away, too.
And as for "Rebel Wisdom", it's neither "rebel" nor "wise"...
Never thought of myself as a badass but I got this one. Glad you are smarter than some of your followers on Covid. It pays, a lot, to look deeper than the surface on that subject.
Oh and I'm still not getting your emails when you post.