14 Comments
author

We will see how that goes. I'm renewing my passport now rather than wait to see what kinds of QR codes and biodata they mandate.

Expand full comment

We got it done earlier this year in Germany. God, what a police state!

Expand full comment
Nov 18, 2022·edited Nov 18, 2022Liked by Graham Seibert

I think that the "hot blonde" mentioned some snow this morning. She's having to rely on the Gennie more and more, since, as you know, the power availability has become quite sporadic.

Dr. Malone and others (FLCCC) have assuredly saved more lives with their advice than has any "recommended" treatment from the deep state "medical" organizations.

As Don Francisco wrote almost half a century ago, people are "running helter skelter to destruction with their fingers in their ears."

Expand full comment
Nov 19, 2022Liked by Graham Seibert

In physics and chemistry, hypotheses are finally recognized as theories when the correlation is 7 nines or 8 nines (forgotten) in experiments (although there are many details). Experiments can be repeated infinitely. In engineering, empirical rules are added, and uncertainty is covered with a safety factor.

In contrast, humanities subjects such as politics, military affairs, and geopolitics cannot obtain correlation coefficients, and repetition is impossible. Human thoughts and actions are unpredictable. Naturally, there are various theories about a certain phenomenon.

Therefore, I think that there is no choice but to learn from history or learn from personal experience and judge with one's common sense.

Medicine is probably halfway between physics and the humanities, even if you look at the papers, there is no clinical trial with a probability of 99.999999%, and of course we can't do it infinitely. It is common in the medical world for drugs that have been tested to be safe to be found to have side effects later on.

After 1000 years, if we can calculate everything from human genes, virus genes, and the molecular structure of drugs, we may somewhat approach physics.

What we amateurs in medicine (including doctors) can do now is to find out whether there is any contradiction and/or consistency between various experiments, hypotheses, and current medical theories (which unfortunately change from time to time).

In this Substack, I think that we should inform each other of the information that seems to be accurate as much as possible, and correct it as soon as we realize that it is wrong.

For those of us who are exposed to the current fraud vaccine, my primitive instinct says that the major premise of medicine is ((Think of what enters the body as a poison until its safety is confirmed)).

Expand full comment
author

Nicely put

Expand full comment
Nov 18, 2022Liked by Graham Seibert

So far no good explanation for these increases. Awaiting data. Authority always has a hard time admitting any error; politicians never do.

Expand full comment
author

Yep. I'm not a lawyer. I present the information I find interesting and/or convincing, but I'm not concerned if you disagree.

Expand full comment

A paper on Spike protein that damages hematopoietic stem cells is published in Nature on June 23, 2021.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41375-021-01332-z

There are other papers that LNP that wraps pseudo-RNA can also enter immune system cells.

Considering that LNP is transfected into babies via mother's milk or transfected in the womb, I think it is only natural that infants are immunocompromised and susceptible to RSV.

Children and adults are the same if they get vaccinated.

If hematopoietic stem cells are killed, it is natural that immune cells will decrease in general and immune function will decline.

Expand full comment
Nov 18, 2022Liked by Graham Seibert

Correction: The 'LNP is transfected~ via' part in the above sentence may be Spike protein only.

Expand full comment

I'll pay attention to your diatribe against fact checkers when you actually explain what and why you disagree with the authors of each. Until then, it is just your biased griping.

Expand full comment
Nov 18, 2022Liked by Graham Seibert

I imagine the argument lies more with the fact checkers who are often quite unqualified to fact check much. Various sources have various opinions based on data. As time progresses we can get a more complete view of the data and assess those opinions. So far many of the writers I've followed on SubStack have prevailed over numerous pronouncements from authorities.

Malone's worry about mRNA and specifically the associated lipids is worthwhile. Some 40 years of experience and many failures made him quite cautious. Evidence accumulates that we are seeing unwanted effects from the mRNA selected proteins and/or associated lipids. I'm not qualified to assess that data, few are. Thus still quite a concern.

Expand full comment

Yet nobody will specifically take on their claims. Curious, don't you think? Graham loves to get down into the weeds with those he believes, but tends to refuse to work equally hard to disprove those that he does not believe even when confronted with contrary evidence. I have provided him specific evidence and facts multiple times. Generally he just ignores me specifics including the specific questions I ask.

Expand full comment

I'm not in a position to judge the points you may have raised with Graham but believe public discourse is a way to educate and inform. I'm much more concerned with the relative silence of NIH officials on specific claims or assessments raised in these SubStacks. Those officials must be aware of the arguments and have an opportunity to directly address the community via their comments, yet they do not. I can conjure up all sorts of reasons they would or wouldn't comment but I think their credibility is in question given evidence I've seen.

Expand full comment

According to Celia Farber, the G20 summit voted to mandate vaccine passports for all international travel. Welcome to the Monkey House where they can inject you with anything. Smile, we'll all soon be glowing in the dark.

Expand full comment