I imagine those of us who follow many of these writers on SubStack are more than aware of the vaccine hazards; few of the writers have the clout of Dowd. It's a bit pricey for me at the moment so thanks for the review. We can hope that this next US Congress will take notice and use the data. Given that not everybody who has been vaccinated has experienced the type of issues that have harmed others but that may relate to the "How bad is my batch". There seems to be a huge variability to the vaccines and perhaps even more variability in how the shots were delivered - apparently the RNA can be quite unstable within the cold chain and even more variability in preparation via dilution at delivery to the end user. We can't know if that's feature or a bug.
What does seem clear from data is the more shots the greater a vulnerability to hazard. And since the data show you are not protected from infection, repeated infections may take their toll. Worse, many who thought they were vaccinated may have never gotten any useful amount of vaccine RNA because of the variability mentioned earlier. And when they get infected they think the mild nature was because of the vaccine when it was their immune system at work. Nobody is checking the various antibody levels which differ if from the vaccine of innate immunity via past infection.
I had expected as the pandemic wound down we might know if the mitigations we tried had much effect. The shutdowns and the masks did very little and now we have evidence that the vaccines were not a savior either. Making sense of all that has happened is quite difficult but in the main I think we were all badly treated by our officials.
Good one. I will promote the book. :) Via sharing this page.
I preordered his book but haven't gotten around to reading it yet. He was recently on the Jerm Warfare podcast: https://jermwarfare.com/conversations/ed-dowd-cause-unknown
Open it. It is such a fast read that you can know what it's about in a few minutes.
Thanks - I do plan to read it but expect it will be preaching to the choir for me.
Thanks. Nice synopsis.
I imagine those of us who follow many of these writers on SubStack are more than aware of the vaccine hazards; few of the writers have the clout of Dowd. It's a bit pricey for me at the moment so thanks for the review. We can hope that this next US Congress will take notice and use the data. Given that not everybody who has been vaccinated has experienced the type of issues that have harmed others but that may relate to the "How bad is my batch". There seems to be a huge variability to the vaccines and perhaps even more variability in how the shots were delivered - apparently the RNA can be quite unstable within the cold chain and even more variability in preparation via dilution at delivery to the end user. We can't know if that's feature or a bug.
What does seem clear from data is the more shots the greater a vulnerability to hazard. And since the data show you are not protected from infection, repeated infections may take their toll. Worse, many who thought they were vaccinated may have never gotten any useful amount of vaccine RNA because of the variability mentioned earlier. And when they get infected they think the mild nature was because of the vaccine when it was their immune system at work. Nobody is checking the various antibody levels which differ if from the vaccine of innate immunity via past infection.
I had expected as the pandemic wound down we might know if the mitigations we tried had much effect. The shutdowns and the masks did very little and now we have evidence that the vaccines were not a savior either. Making sense of all that has happened is quite difficult but in the main I think we were all badly treated by our officials.