Document released by PMDA, Japan's drug regulatory agency, on 2021 Feb. at the request of someone's FOIA. The same goes for the ovary, but looking at the graph, it seems that LNP will continue to exist in the liver for about half a year.
The clogged Spike protein will definitely be made in about half a year, maybe a year. The resulting Spike protein is distributed throughout the body.
Japan can look at this somewhat objectively, not having its own vaccines in the running. I hope some in Japan are feeling they have been misled and abused.
Bit late, but how did we ever manage to convince women that a business ought to be operated by women? Dressing like men, even to wearing muted colors? The daily grind of creating widgets? That nasty stuff of firing people and often eternal travel from one hotel to the next with little leisure time?
Somewhere along time we managed to tell women, men had always been in charge and that needed to be reversed? Not that the combination of a male and female thoughts might be a way to a better conclusion, if they were not competitors but a team - regardless of who was "in charge". As competitors I suspect the combination less than optimal.
You knuckle-dragging troglodyte! Those are my points exactly as I compose my review of Women After All. A brief squib. Author Melvyn Konner wrote in 2015 that women CEOs run "General Motors, Hewlett-Packard, IBM, Archer Daniels Midland, Lockheed Martin, DuPont, General Dynamics, Oil States International, Xerox, Duke Energy, Gannett Company, Yahoo, Alliant Energy, Schnitzer Steel, ITT, International Game Technology, Clearwater Paper, and Benchmark Electronics."
We don't remember the names of many of these women. We remember that Carlie Fiorina at Hewlett-Packard, Melissa Meyer at Yahoo and Ginny Rometty at IBM didn't accomplish much and are gone. Mary Barra remains at the helm of General Motors, the stock price of which has surged from $35 to $36 in her nine years of leadership.
I haven't tracked the success of female CEOs but it might tell a story. I suspect in large corps, the nominal seniors share a lot of decisions (rarely any blame) your three examples are illustrative of some bad decisions in moderate corps.
OTOH, I suspect female stock brokers might be better because their hormones don't force an excess of hubris over choices. But that's a long term thing, the boys might do better short term. Few women ever reach to top in those firms, glass ceiling perhaps but short term results impress management (and bonus pay).
RoundingTheEarth (https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/), Matthew Crawford, has sent me three guest subscriptions to give away. Email me via the hyperlink through my name at the bottom of the article.
as an aside...I read a few of your articles....I agree totally with the Cover/vaccine post but disagree about your war analysis..... I have the below:
On January 25th, Turkiye’s Hürseda Haber somehow leaked online, allegedly from Israel’s Mossad, the losses by both Ukraine and Russia, thus far in Ukraine’s war:
UKRAINE:
157,000 Dead
234,000 injured
17,230 Captives
234 Dead – NATO military trainers (US and UK)
2,458 Dead – NATO soldiers (Germany, Poland, Lithuania, …)
5,360 Dead – Mercenaries
302 Planes
212 Helicopters
497 Air defense systems
2,750 (S)UAV
6,320 Tanks and armored vehicles
7,360 Howitzer (Artillery systems)
RUSSIA:
18,480 dead
44,500 Injured
323 Captives
23 Planes
56 helicopters
12 Air defense systems
200 (S)UAV
889 Tanks and armored vehicles
427 Howitzer (Artillery systems)
These figures were reported also in a confusing February 7th youtube from Kim Iversen, mixing it in with lots of irrevevant information, and racing it by, far too fast for hearers to assimilate or intelligently evaluate. Thus far, almost 3,000 reader-comments have been posted to it.
As regards the reliability of the Hürseda Haber report, each reader will have to evaluate that oneself. However, if the report is anywhere near accurate, then Ukraine has lost around 8.5 soldiers dead for every one Russian soldier dead, and the other multiples are: 5.25 Injured, 15 Planes, 4 Helicopters, 41 Air Defense Systems, 14 UAV’s, 7 Tanks, and 17 Howitzers.
Either you or Substack are incompetent. I don't think it's them. I do not see your name among my subscribers. If you are using some obscure pseudonym, it's your problem.
Read your articles though and I agree totally re. Covid/vaccines....Disagree about your comments on Ukraine:
On January 25th, Turkiye’s Hürseda Haber somehow leaked online, allegedly from Israel’s Mossad, the losses by both Ukraine and Russia, thus far in Ukraine’s war:
UKRAINE:
157,000 Dead
234,000 injured
17,230 Captives
234 Dead – NATO military trainers (US and UK)
2,458 Dead – NATO soldiers (Germany, Poland, Lithuania, …)
5,360 Dead – Mercenaries
302 Planes
212 Helicopters
497 Air defense systems
2,750 (S)UAV
6,320 Tanks and armored vehicles
7,360 Howitzer (Artillery systems)
RUSSIA:
18,480 dead
44,500 Injured
323 Captives
23 Planes
56 helicopters
12 Air defense systems
200 (S)UAV
889 Tanks and armored vehicles
427 Howitzer (Artillery systems)
These figures were reported also in a confusing February 7th youtube from Kim Iversen, mixing it in with lots of irrevevant information, and racing it by, far too fast for hearers to assimilate or intelligently evaluate. Thus far, almost 3,000 reader-comments have been posted to it.
As regards the reliability of the Hürseda Haber report, each reader will have to evaluate that oneself. However, if the report is anywhere near accurate, then Ukraine has lost around 8.5 soldiers dead for every one Russian soldier dead, and the other multiples are: 5.25 Injured, 15 Planes, 4 Helicopters, 41 Air Defense Systems, 14 UAV’s, 7 Tanks, and 17 Howitzers.
And you believe a random Turk over every other estimate from every other source? It's pretty clear that this 'report' is completely nonsensical. To believe that the Ukranians have lost more than 8 times the casualties of the Russians, and to have simultaneously thwarted the Russian invasion and pushed back the Russians from large swathes of land. That obviously makes no sense. It obviously is not true. It does not match up with reality. Which leads to the question, why would anyone believe something that is obviously not true?
Kit....please read....don't listen to mainstream media. I bet you still believe we had every reason to attack Iraq WMD's et al.)...I'll debate you all day long on the Ukrainian war...Let's start with the economic repercussions....How did those sanctions work out ? Total boomerang back to Europeans...Also, have you heard latest verification from S. Hersh that lapdog Germany took out NSII at behest of it's master the U.S. We're now close to nuclear war because of U.S. escalation.....16year old Uke youths are being shanghaied to be slaughtered by Rusk artillery...They die without even seeing the enemy...Similar. to CSA in 1865 or Nazis in March 1945.....Guys like you are causing these brave Ukrainians to die....Most of Uke has been evacuated ...Also, how about the cease fire agreement brokered by Erdogan in Feb/March agreed by Vlad and Zel. but prevented by Joe who sent the lapdog Boris to Kiev
Jack - Please, please figure out how to unsubscribe. I suppose that attracting the likes of you is the price of success, but it is one I'd rather not pay.
Good grief. What a lot of complete irrelevancies. You have nothing to back up the claims that the Ukranian casualty rate is more than 8 times the Russian rate Instead you just want to randomly raise unrelated matters?
I'm sorry to be blunt, but it looks like you might have a very low IQ and not be worth talking to any further.
Document released by PMDA, Japan's drug regulatory agency, on 2021 Feb. at the request of someone's FOIA. The same goes for the ovary, but looking at the graph, it seems that LNP will continue to exist in the liver for about half a year.
The clogged Spike protein will definitely be made in about half a year, maybe a year. The resulting Spike protein is distributed throughout the body.
https://pandemictimeline.com/2021/05/japan-shares-biodistribution-study-of-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine/
Japan can look at this somewhat objectively, not having its own vaccines in the running. I hope some in Japan are feeling they have been misled and abused.
Bit late, but how did we ever manage to convince women that a business ought to be operated by women? Dressing like men, even to wearing muted colors? The daily grind of creating widgets? That nasty stuff of firing people and often eternal travel from one hotel to the next with little leisure time?
Somewhere along time we managed to tell women, men had always been in charge and that needed to be reversed? Not that the combination of a male and female thoughts might be a way to a better conclusion, if they were not competitors but a team - regardless of who was "in charge". As competitors I suspect the combination less than optimal.
You knuckle-dragging troglodyte! Those are my points exactly as I compose my review of Women After All. A brief squib. Author Melvyn Konner wrote in 2015 that women CEOs run "General Motors, Hewlett-Packard, IBM, Archer Daniels Midland, Lockheed Martin, DuPont, General Dynamics, Oil States International, Xerox, Duke Energy, Gannett Company, Yahoo, Alliant Energy, Schnitzer Steel, ITT, International Game Technology, Clearwater Paper, and Benchmark Electronics."
We don't remember the names of many of these women. We remember that Carlie Fiorina at Hewlett-Packard, Melissa Meyer at Yahoo and Ginny Rometty at IBM didn't accomplish much and are gone. Mary Barra remains at the helm of General Motors, the stock price of which has surged from $35 to $36 in her nine years of leadership.
I haven't tracked the success of female CEOs but it might tell a story. I suspect in large corps, the nominal seniors share a lot of decisions (rarely any blame) your three examples are illustrative of some bad decisions in moderate corps.
OTOH, I suspect female stock brokers might be better because their hormones don't force an excess of hubris over choices. But that's a long term thing, the boys might do better short term. Few women ever reach to top in those firms, glass ceiling perhaps but short term results impress management (and bonus pay).
RoundingTheEarth (https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/), Matthew Crawford, has sent me three guest subscriptions to give away. Email me via the hyperlink through my name at the bottom of the article.
as an aside...I read a few of your articles....I agree totally with the Cover/vaccine post but disagree about your war analysis..... I have the below:
On January 25th, Turkiye’s Hürseda Haber somehow leaked online, allegedly from Israel’s Mossad, the losses by both Ukraine and Russia, thus far in Ukraine’s war:
UKRAINE:
157,000 Dead
234,000 injured
17,230 Captives
234 Dead – NATO military trainers (US and UK)
2,458 Dead – NATO soldiers (Germany, Poland, Lithuania, …)
5,360 Dead – Mercenaries
302 Planes
212 Helicopters
497 Air defense systems
2,750 (S)UAV
6,320 Tanks and armored vehicles
7,360 Howitzer (Artillery systems)
RUSSIA:
18,480 dead
44,500 Injured
323 Captives
23 Planes
56 helicopters
12 Air defense systems
200 (S)UAV
889 Tanks and armored vehicles
427 Howitzer (Artillery systems)
These figures were reported also in a confusing February 7th youtube from Kim Iversen, mixing it in with lots of irrevevant information, and racing it by, far too fast for hearers to assimilate or intelligently evaluate. Thus far, almost 3,000 reader-comments have been posted to it.
As regards the reliability of the Hürseda Haber report, each reader will have to evaluate that oneself. However, if the report is anywhere near accurate, then Ukraine has lost around 8.5 soldiers dead for every one Russian soldier dead, and the other multiples are: 5.25 Injured, 15 Planes, 4 Helicopters, 41 Air Defense Systems, 14 UAV’s, 7 Tanks, and 17 Howitzers.
Comment board getting quite crowded
I have been trying to UNSUBSCRIBE from this for over a month....Please stop cluttering my inbox with your nonsense....Jack Tiscione
Either you or Substack are incompetent. I don't think it's them. I do not see your name among my subscribers. If you are using some obscure pseudonym, it's your problem.
Read your articles though and I agree totally re. Covid/vaccines....Disagree about your comments on Ukraine:
On January 25th, Turkiye’s Hürseda Haber somehow leaked online, allegedly from Israel’s Mossad, the losses by both Ukraine and Russia, thus far in Ukraine’s war:
UKRAINE:
157,000 Dead
234,000 injured
17,230 Captives
234 Dead – NATO military trainers (US and UK)
2,458 Dead – NATO soldiers (Germany, Poland, Lithuania, …)
5,360 Dead – Mercenaries
302 Planes
212 Helicopters
497 Air defense systems
2,750 (S)UAV
6,320 Tanks and armored vehicles
7,360 Howitzer (Artillery systems)
RUSSIA:
18,480 dead
44,500 Injured
323 Captives
23 Planes
56 helicopters
12 Air defense systems
200 (S)UAV
889 Tanks and armored vehicles
427 Howitzer (Artillery systems)
These figures were reported also in a confusing February 7th youtube from Kim Iversen, mixing it in with lots of irrevevant information, and racing it by, far too fast for hearers to assimilate or intelligently evaluate. Thus far, almost 3,000 reader-comments have been posted to it.
As regards the reliability of the Hürseda Haber report, each reader will have to evaluate that oneself. However, if the report is anywhere near accurate, then Ukraine has lost around 8.5 soldiers dead for every one Russian soldier dead, and the other multiples are: 5.25 Injured, 15 Planes, 4 Helicopters, 41 Air Defense Systems, 14 UAV’s, 7 Tanks, and 17 Howitzers.
And you believe a random Turk over every other estimate from every other source? It's pretty clear that this 'report' is completely nonsensical. To believe that the Ukranians have lost more than 8 times the casualties of the Russians, and to have simultaneously thwarted the Russian invasion and pushed back the Russians from large swathes of land. That obviously makes no sense. It obviously is not true. It does not match up with reality. Which leads to the question, why would anyone believe something that is obviously not true?
Kit....please read....don't listen to mainstream media. I bet you still believe we had every reason to attack Iraq WMD's et al.)...I'll debate you all day long on the Ukrainian war...Let's start with the economic repercussions....How did those sanctions work out ? Total boomerang back to Europeans...Also, have you heard latest verification from S. Hersh that lapdog Germany took out NSII at behest of it's master the U.S. We're now close to nuclear war because of U.S. escalation.....16year old Uke youths are being shanghaied to be slaughtered by Rusk artillery...They die without even seeing the enemy...Similar. to CSA in 1865 or Nazis in March 1945.....Guys like you are causing these brave Ukrainians to die....Most of Uke has been evacuated ...Also, how about the cease fire agreement brokered by Erdogan in Feb/March agreed by Vlad and Zel. but prevented by Joe who sent the lapdog Boris to Kiev
Jack - Please, please figure out how to unsubscribe. I suppose that attracting the likes of you is the price of success, but it is one I'd rather not pay.
Good grief. What a lot of complete irrelevancies. You have nothing to back up the claims that the Ukranian casualty rate is more than 8 times the Russian rate Instead you just want to randomly raise unrelated matters?
I'm sorry to be blunt, but it looks like you might have a very low IQ and not be worth talking to any further.
Your substack is 16 days old. Yet you have been trying to unsubscribe for over a month? How curious.