8 Comments
User's avatar
istt's avatar

I, too, sold off my BTC when it broached $100K. I will never understand how this blockchain currency became an investor's dream. If Nakamoto can create it so can other technologists. And with quantum computing entering the fray maybe it all goes the way of the dodo.

Expand full comment
Thomas Pierce's avatar

I have a friend who was an early adopter of cryptocurrencies. He bought 10,000 coins when they were super cheap and now he has about $300 million in the currency of choice, Hopium. Of course, he still can't spend it anywhere, but like scrooge McDuck he can swim in his riches.

Expand full comment
Joel W. Hay, PhD's avatar

Why the hell should the US, which has a national debt of $35 trillion and at least four times that in unfunded Social Security, Medicare and other broken promises to future generations be "investing" in bitcoin or anything else? With what "money"? To what end? When I see the way the Biden/Harris admin is pushing out money (newly minted debt) for transgender surgeries for illegal alien felons in US prisons, not to mention all the other trillions wasted on Covid, climate scams, energy scams, agriculture scams, education scams etc. there is only one reason for government "investing" in crypto. They'd do it for the crypto bros, who are just another special interest with their hooks into corrupt pols to make money at the public trough. Just like big PhRMA/mRNA, big military, big energy, big climate scam, big welfare scam, big health care scam, etc. But don't expect anything from 'Operation Warp Speed' Trump or RFK Jr., who just had dinner together with big PhRMA to plan how to get new cancer mRNA jabs into all the people that they gave cancer to with their Covid mRNA jabs.

Speaking of Ukraine and big military, they're now saying that M1A1 Abrams main battle tanks (which cost the US govt over $1 trillion over the years) are as useless in the drone age as horse cavalry in WW2. The Ukrainians have been forced by necessity to innovate more effective methods of warfare that are COST EFFECTIVE, not scramjet/RDC engine hypersonic missiles that cost $X billion each for the cost-plus military industrial complex stockholders. It shows how much more important motivation is when incentives are aligned with reality. Just like SpaceX vs Boeing Boeing Gone! There's a reason the US hasn't won a war since WW2, since the draw in Korea, we fight wars through and for the Pentagon swamp bureaucracy and its subcontractors and they (e.g. the Viet Cong, jihadis, Taliban, ISIS) fight wars through and for their people.

Speaking of government psyops, why are we now suddenly being reminded that eastern Ukraine sits on many trillions of dollars worth of natural gas, lithium and rare earth minerals? My guess is that Trump, Zelensky and maybe Putin are going to make a deal soon.

Expand full comment
Graham Seibert's avatar

A small addendum in support of your argument. I'm reading Marc Girandot's "The Needle's Secret. It is a simple explanation of all the things that go wrong when you get a Covid jab... mainly when the shot accidentally hits a vein or artery instead of remaining in the muscle.

Girandot's CV somewhat tracks my own. Time with Booz, Allen, time in Argentina. Applying general knowledge and common sense to problems where the "experts" rely on what they have been taught.

https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/the-needles-secret

Expand full comment
Warren Capps's avatar

I would love to see a detailed article from you on your ideas about the New World Order. Who is in it? How is it organized? Where is it located? What are its specific goals, etc?

Expand full comment
Graham Seibert's avatar

It's a 50-volume project and I haven't started volume 1.

With regard to Central Bank Digital Currencies, the NWO is any SOB who wants to watch my every financial transaction to figure out if I'm naughty or nice. Stuff like buying guns or subscribing to subversive Substack sites.

Expand full comment
Warren Capps's avatar

Then what makes you think you are sufficiently knowledgeable to use NWO in your arguments?

Expand full comment
Graham Seibert's avatar

Are you looking for a serious argument???? I'm knowledgeable enough to use "inconsequential" in an argument. "Pointless" as well.

Expand full comment