Why would Google’s YouTube do that? Crass lucre? Good guess!
20221002
You may wonder how solid the claims I make in my video on depopulation are. They must be fairly true. I have the YouTube certificate of veracity.
Because I have concluded that I really don’t need YouTube, I decided to post it. Next time I do a video like this I’m going to redact it the way the FBI redacts a Trump search warrant. Post the real thing on Rumble, and just for a laugh, the bowdlerized version on Safe and Effective YouTube. You will see me mouthing words with the sound off and my mouth covered to prevent lip reading.
Why would YouTube/Google do that? Does money come to mind? This today from A Midwestern Doctor.
Antitrust Violations Return To Silicon Valley
Many of the key players in Big Tech became heavily invested in the pharmaceutical industry shortly before COVID-19, particularly Google and Facebook, the two companies who directly and through their subsidiaries (e.g. Youtube and Instagram) control most of the traffic on the internet. Google for instance has heavily invested in health care, with investments in pharmaceutical companies (including one that both tested the COVID-19 vaccines and profited off COVID-19 testing), vaccines, medical devices, and purchasing massive amounts of private health care data. Facebook has also focused on obtaining biometric data, soliciting pharmaceutical advertisers, and making its platform as amenable to them as possible.
It should thus come as no surprise that these companies aggressively censored any type of “misinformation” that threatened their investments throughout the pandemic, including subjects, such as COVID-19 originating from a lab leak or the vaccines not preventing COVID-19 transmission (which are no longer considered to be “fake news”).
That’s a brief post from Lake WeBeGone before I’m off to Toastmasters with Eddie and Zoriana, giving Oksana a few hours to herself while Marianna sleeps.
In Japan, vaccination started in February 2021.
At first, I saw videos of side effects on YouTube, but they were immediately deleted from early summer.
This made me realize something was wrong.
After that, I happened to see the documents of the BillGates Foundation's investment and support recipients, and they are giving money to companies around the world.
I'm not good at English, so it's a pity that I can't reach even if I try to see it again, but in my memory, there were more than hundreds of recipients.
His evil hands permeate all directions.
It looks like he wants to control information, and greed or control the world.
Not only pseudoVaccine but also anything from now on.
If it can be controlled with information, it will be cheap and efficient, so it is a convenient means for B.Gate.
People like him are connected by a sympathetic spirit. I think they are probably WEF mates.
: Funded or sponsored by the Bill & Melinnda Foundation.
DerSpiegel ← $2.5 million (2018), $2.9 million (2021)
The Guardian ← $14 million.
LeMonde ← $4 million.
BBC ← $50 million.
CNN4 ← $250 million.
Microsoft entered the Facebook advertiser exclusively in the 2000s.
Reuters, LinkedIn←Owned by M.Soft, M.Soft←Invested by BlackStone, also Pfizer invested by BS.
JimSmith: Former Reuter CEO is a Pfizer board member and WEF board member → complete conflict of interest.
Below are sites that seem safe so far.
Substack ;here
https://duckduckgo.com/
https://www.kla.tv/ ;GermanVideoSite
https://www.nicovideo.jp/ ；JapaneseVideoSite
https://note.com/ ;JapaneseBlogSite
https://odysee.com/ ; U.S. Video Site
https://rumble.com/ ; U.S. Video Site
Hi Graham - I always take it as a badge of honour if Facebook, Google, or the UK Government disagree with me when I offer facts. Libertarian journalist John Stossel sued Facebook for defamation after their fact-checkers claimed disinformation of one of his well researched and multiple names sources report was blocked and removed so the public could not see it. Facebook admited in court filings its “fact checks” are merely opinion. Stossel won his case but Facebook continues. Now it seems the fact-checker are claiming missing context which to me means the author did not give an explaination of the facts that met their political view especially when the facts need no explaination. I suggest you move other to another platform like Rumble (https://rumble.com). Stossel story found online https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com/report-facebook-admits-in-court-filings-its-fact-checks-are-merely-opinion-and-now-everything-is-in-question/ I encourage you to keep telling the truth.