But they don’t seem to care whether we live or die.
There is a question of how much of an investment the masters of the universe have in the future of the planet they pretend to want to protect.
George Soros has five children well into adulthood. There is no mention on the Internet of any grandchildren.
Klaus Schwab has two children. There is no mention on the Internet of any grandchildren.
Anthony Fauci has three daughters. An article says he went a year without seeing them on account of Covid. No mention of grandchildren.
Warren Buffett has one natural, one adoptive child (and disinherited) child. No grandchildren mentioned.
Bill Gates has three children. He has one grandchild, by his daughter and an Olympic equestrian with an Islamic name. Does not sound like grandchildren are his priority either.
I’m going into the Gates situation more than others, but one will find commonalities with Omidyar of eBay, Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, the Google crowd and others. The exception of which I know would be Larry Ellison of Oracle. He spends his money on racing yachts and not minding other people’s business. But returning to Gates:
Gates has two sisters. There is no mention that either of them has children. He has no apparent nieces and nephews.
William Gates Senior was a long-time member of the Planned Parenthood leadership. A dyed in the wool eugenicist. Bill has often offered the opinion that the world population needs to be trimmed.
In education, Gates provided the major funding behind the Common Core Curriculum, which deprives teachers of the right to choose what and how to teach. He is able to pay school administrators to appear to like it. Teachers not so much.
Gates was a major advocate of the Covid 19 vaccines. He was a shareholder in the companies that sell them and an advocate of the Warp Speed process that developed them. If he had any concerns about their safety, he could have insisted on a longer and more rigorous set of clinical trials. All of the evidence goes the other way. He wanted the vaccines as quickly as possible. He condoned taking shortcuts.
Gates has been associated with deadly vaccine campaigns, especially in Africa, for decades. He has been a major funder of the WHO and GAVI vaccine initiatives. His objective is apparently to vaccinate just about everybody against just about everything.
He wants to ensure through digital IDs and vaccine passports that nobody escapes being vaccinated. There would be no need to do this if vaccination were merely a personal choice. A person refusing a vaccine would be risking only his own health. Gates’ desire to force everybody to get vaccines assumes the unproven proposition that herd immunity is desirable and feasible for every type of vaccine. Very few immunologists agree with this position.
It is easy to conclude that Gates is interested in something other than the well-being of the human population. It could be just money – he has made a lot from vaccines. It could be more sinister than that. It could be that, like his father, he is interested in eugenics – depopulating the world.
And it could be even simpler than that. It could be a matter of ego and control. He has the power to force people to get vaccines and no moral compunction not to. He will do it because he can.
This same egotism and lack of moral compunction is evident elsewhere. Gates is a supporter of geo-engineering – scattering reflective material high in the atmosphere to reduce sunlight. Nobody asked him to do this. It is an incredibly presumptuous quest to supposedly save the planet on a freelance basis. There is no guarantee it would work. The idea has many doubters. If it worked at all, it would certainly impact agriculture in different countries differently. Some would suffer. He mentions no provision for unintended consequences, or mention of taking liability if something goes wrong.
Gates makes three questionable contentions: that warming is real and threatens human existence, that carbon dioxide is the culprit, and that something must be done quickly. He has to realize that many climate experts disagree. The disagreement is principled. Skeptics manage to make their voices heard despite the fact that they are shut up and deplatformed by government, academia and the media. The best-selling books on climate overwhelmingly debunk rather than support the global warming claim. Those who support the theory are mainly in governments, media and academia – all flush with Gates’ money.
Gates is pushing a digital IDs system, first in Kenya where he has apparently bought the favor of the president. People will be recognized biometrically – by fingerprint or by the iris of their eyes. His dream is to unify banking, tax collection, medical records, vaccination, education, migration and every other sort of record and tie them to personal traits that cannot be counterfeited.
Common Africans certainly never asked for it. They distrust systems and surveillance. We should be glad that this scheme is rolling out first in Africa, where just about every sort of systemization fails. First and most obviously, electronic identification depends on reliable electricity. They often don’t have it.
No group of citizens in the developed world wants digital IDs or central-bank digital currencies either. It would represent a loss of privacy and autonomy. We certainly do not want vaccine passports. The golden moment for introducing those intrusions was at the height of Covid 19, and they failed even then. As the dangers of the Covid jabs, and vaccines in general are becoming more evident, more and more people will simply say no. They are already saying no to boosters. Childhood vaccination rates are plummeting.
Gates has an intense personality. As a child he loved games to the point that people avoided playing with him. He was intent on winning to the point of being asocial. He has many characteristics of autism / Asperger syndrome, among them a seeming lack of empathy. Is he playing with humanity with the same lack of feeling as a child taking apart a live beetle?
Since these Masters of the Universe have few or no descendants, it is fair to ask for whom are they endeavoring to make the world a better place? For us? We didn’t ask, and we don’t want their help.
Why do they do it? Is for (1) money, though all of them surely have enough, or (2) power, of which none will ever have enough, or (3) the fun of tinkering with gadgets, even those that imperil all of mankind? They don’t care. They have little stake in the future of mankind. Philanthropath is therefore an apt neologism. They are doing it because they are psychopaths. Because they can, not because it will help anybody.
Governments around the world are increasingly skeptical of the WHO, which continues to push a pandemic treaty and international health regulations update. It is questionable whether these will be accepted, and if accepted, whether governments will be enthusiastic about implementing them.
As hard as the Masters of the universe, the UN and the World Health Organization are pushing these ideas, my perception is that the resistance has gotten organized and found its voice. I hope so.
Margaret Anna Alice has a good recap of the situation in her Letter to Robert Malone. There is a split in the medical freedom movement between those such as Malone who would ascribe the missteps of the last three years more to human failure than to malevolence and those who are convinced that there are evil actors behind everything.
Peter and Ginger Breggins, Michael Yeadon, Igor Chudov, Joel Smalley and many others are in the latter camp. They believe that so many wrong decisions could not have happened by accident. There is no consensus on why the evil people are doing what they do. Is it money? Do they want to depopulate the earth? Is it spite?
The simple explanation I propose above is that they do it because they can. It is a power-play by people without emotion. While other factors may be at work, the idea that they do it because they want to and can get away with it has a lot of explanatory power.
Bob Homans did not publish today.
That’s the news from Lake WeBeGone, where we are drifting into another weekend. They go by so quickly!
The idea came to me when I looked down from a 600m high radio tower. MicroSoft's stock is worth more than $2 trillion, and Gates owns 5%. He also owns stocks in other companies. He receives 7 to 10 billion dollars a year in dividends without doing anything. That's more than the GDP of a small country. From his point of view, most humans are no better than bacteria or viruses, and must be exterminated.
Excellent summary of where we're at! If any non-roboticized human survives this mass extinction it would be great to pull responses out of people like Gates, Bezos, Zuckerberg, Schwab, Fauci etc. using whatever means the CIA thinks are legal and productive! This is an historical cycle that bears never repeating!