Stuff I forgot to mention, and new things that come up, and time on my hands
20211224 #2
There is inconsistency among the data on the vaccine skeptics' side. On the one hand, there is the argument that the vaccines are simply dangerous by design. That they weaken a person's immune system. If this is the case, they should affect every recipient about the same.
On the other side, Craig Paardekooper has found by sifting through the VAERS reports of vaccine injuries that there are incredible differences among the lethality of different batches by the same pharmaceutical manufacturers. Each batch contains enough serum for 20,000 doses. The most dangerous batch produced by Moderna resulted in 5010 adverse effect reports and 60 reported deaths. I offer these numbers with the usual caveat – the VAERS system usually collects only one in 40 adverse events. In this case they have to be doing better, because an entire quarter of the batch is reported as causing problems. On the other hand, most batches aren't reported as killing anybody. Which is good – one death in 20,000 would be far from acceptable. The deadliest Pfizer batch has only 51 reports of death, but once again most batches aren't reported as killing anybody.
Such incredibly diverse effects are statistically not just improbable, they are virtually impossible. The most benign explanation would be that there is a lack of quality control. However, as Craig Paardekooper reports, the appearance of the deadly lots is not at all random in either time or lethality. It appears to be part of a bigger plan embracing all three American pharmaceuticals manufactures.
There have been many reports of unlisted ingredients by the three. All researchers state that such ingredients do not show up in every lot. These ingredients include graphene oxide, metallic particles, various microorganisms and the like. Craig Paardekooper has not to this point associated his analysis of the deadly batches with the other researchers' analysis of unlisted ingredients, but a correlation would seem quite likely.
It is hard to know what to make of this. It may be that absent the unlisted ingredients the vaccines are relatively safe, at least in the short term. However, the longer-term effects on the immune system were predicted long before their rollout simply on the basis of what was known about mRNA technology. While some may be more deadly than others immediately after the injection, there is reason to expect that they are all pernicious in the long term.
I have written this question to people who cover this issue:
1. If, per the Spanish researchers La Quinta Columna, much of the lethality of the vaccines produced by American manufacturers is due to unlisted ingredients that appear in not all batches, and
2. If per Craig Paardekooper, the lethality varies incredibly widely among batches by American manufactures, and
3. If the major long term liability with the baseline serum is in the mRNA components' tendency to reprogram the immune system, to a greater extent than other vaccines, then
4. It could be that the Chinese and Russian vaccines, without unlisted ingredients or mRNA, might not damage their populations to anywhere near the extent that the American population is damaged, which might mean that
5. Somebody has conspired to reduce the American population, and the Chinese and Russians are smart enough to dodge that bullet.
Let's see if anybody feels like putting the pieces together.
In other news, the Current Problems in Cardiology article by Jessica Rose and Peter McCullough that Elsevier "temporarily removed" three months ago is now available on Jessica's website. It is clear why the medical establishment would not want this peer review document to be available.
The Progressives among you in my readership love to throw ad hominem arguments back at me, repeating the claims of "fact checkers" to discredit pieces like this which have been produced by doctors and scientists far more credentialed than either they or I. Recently this has included Dr. Robert Malone, Dr. Peter McCullough and Dr. Simone Gold. At some point it has to stop. There simply are not that many plagiarists, pornographers, pederasts, and polygamists out there among the professional community. You may at some point be forced to stop and read, perhaps even refute what they have to say.
The establishment is losing its grip. Below I have copied a strong critique of a peer reviewed article that appeared in the professional journal of heart specialists, Circulation. However, the magazine continues to make the article itself available for download, and carry the abstract, containing the damning conclusion that I have put in italics at the end. The appearance of articles with titles such as 335 Athlete Cardiac Arrests, Serious Issues, 190 Dead, After COVID Shot in the popular press might force their hand. Here is the CYA:
This article expresses concern regarding abstract “Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning” which originally published November 8, 2021; https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712.
Soon after publication of the above abstract in Circulation, it was brought to the American Heart Association Committee on Scientific Sessions Program’s attention that there are potential errors in the abstract. Specifically, there are several typographical errors, there is no data in the abstract regarding myocardial T-cell infiltration, there are no statistical analyses for significance provided, and the author is not clear that only anecdotal data was used.
We are publishing this Expression of Concern until a suitable correction is published to indicate that the abstract in its current version may not be reliable.
Steven R Gundry
Originally published8 Nov 2021Circulation. 2021;144:A10712
And here is the abstract:
Abstract
Our group has been using the PLUS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc, Irvine, CA) a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers which generates a score predicting the 5 yr risk (percentage chance) of a new Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). The score is based on changes from the norm of multiple protein biomarkers including IL-16, a proinflammatory cytokine, soluble Fas, an inducer of apoptosis, and Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF)which serves as a marker for chemotaxis of T-cells into epithelium and cardiac tissue, among other markers. Elevation above the norm increases the PULS score, while decreases below the norm lowers the PULS score.The score has been measured every 3-6 months in our patient population for 8 years. Recently, with the advent of the mRNA COVID 19 vaccines (vac) by Moderna and Pfizer, dramatic changes in the PULS score became apparent in most patients.This report summarizes those results. A total of 566 pts, aged 28 to 97, M:F ratio 1:1 seen in a preventive cardiology practice had a new PULS test drawn from 2 to 10 weeks following the 2nd COVID shot and was compared to the previous PULS score drawn 3 to 5 months previously pre- shot. Baseline IL-16 increased from 35=/-20 above the norm to 82 =/- 75 above the norm post-vac; sFas increased from 22+/- 15 above the norm to 46=/-24 above the norm post-vac; HGF increased from 42+/-12 above the norm to 86+/-31 above the norm post-vac. These changes resulted in an increase of the PULS score from 11% 5 yr ACS risk to 25% 5 yr ACS risk. At the time of this report, these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac.We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.
Checking my sources, I find that pharmaceutical ivermectin is no longer available for sale here. I sense the long arm of the US government – undoubtedly with inducements financed by the US taxpayer – has led them to curtail it. Fortunately, I have a big supply. More than that it has become clear that the only difference between veterinary and pharmaceutical ivermectin is in dosage. If you know what you're doing, the "horse dewormer" should serve the purpose in an emergency.
That's the second missive of the day from Lake WeBeGone, where I have been exiled to my office as the rest of the family, fluent in Ukrainian, practiced for a Christmas caroling expedition to take place next week. Which is exactly what beautiful women and children should be doing this time of year. And I should learn enough Ukrainian to join them next year.