Russian missiles. Confronting the Covid leviathan.

20220304

I've been curious what I've been listening to for the last week. Here is a write up on Russian missiles.  My guess is that we are hearing mostly the truck based Iskander missile, with a payload of 500-700 kg, half to three-quarter ton. It's able to handle both high explosive and thermobaric warheads. I saw one claim of the latter hitting Kyiv, although I have to believe if it was one, it would be many.

They are supposedly also shooting at us from ships in the Black Sea. My guess would be that would be the Kalibr missiles, which have a 2 ton warhead.

Nasty stuff. Expensive stuff. Devastating for appropriate targets, but inappropriate for any number of reasons for targeting high-rise apartments, which seems to be what's happening.

The deeper we get into this, the more sources we find. The commander-in-chief of the Ukrainian Armed Forces has a Facebook site with recent photographs and videos.

It appears that the heroic resistance to our South in Mariupol and Kherson has been overcome. I may have been overoptimistic. There are still serious battles to come.  Gary reports that Kremlin propaganda seems to be solidifying support in Russia. Reports we have heard about unrest among the Russian people may have had a propaganda aspect to them as well.

At any rate, we still have electricity and Internet.  Don't know how long it will last.  I cannot imagine what Putin will do if and when Ukraine surrenders – he will have two wrecked countries to deal with – but that may be the case.

The establishment still has a firm grip on the Covid argument. The WHO is flogging a global vaccine passport.  Surgeon General Vivek Murthy is pushing for comprehensive tech censorship.  On the other hand, the NFL has dropped all vaccine nonsense.  Still, for the time being severe punishment awaits anybody who questions any aspect of the narrative. Those aspects include:
o  The timing of the disease's emergence and spread
o  The overall danger of the disease
o  The threat that the disease poses by age group
o  The transmissibility of the disease
o  The possibility of herd immunity
o  Natural immunity following infection
o  Alternative medications such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine
o  The reliability of the statistics collected on Covid
o  Manipulation and misinterpretation of the statistical data collected on Covid
o  The approval process for the biological injectables called vaccines
o  The unlisted ingredients in those biological products
o  The adverse effects to the injectable biological products
o  The systems in place to collect adverse effects data
o  The manipulation of the adverse effects data.
o  The connection between the pandemic and the World Economic Forum's New World Order
o  The financial arrangements between the vaccine manufacturers and governments
o  The relationship between the vaccine manufacturers and biological weapons researchers

A person can get fired, blackballed, canceled, sued, physically roughed up, and disowned by friends, social media, publishers, social clubs and almost any other organization for asking embarrassing questions about any of the above. The people who do so are an exceptional bunch of human beings.

From the very beginning a lot of people were saying that the measures taken violated the Nürnberg code on human subjects research and medical ethics. The shots were given prior to FDA approval. They were mandatory, at least for maintaining a job and other aspects of a normal life. There was no informed consent – no warnings about the experimental nature of the drugs or potential adverse effects.

So much of the corporate, academic and government apparatus was coordinated in pushing these efforts that there is little hope of finding a court that would hear the arguments made above. Therefore a group of professionals, mostly lawyers, came together in a court of public opinion to hold a mock trial to at least give an airing to these issues.

California/German attorney Reiner Fuellmich spearheaded the affair and called together a group of experts for his grand jury.  The grand jury investigation for the court of public opinion was a several day affair involving witnesses speaking on many aspects of the problem. It was of course recorded, but it would take real dedication to listen to the whole thing.

I have been following this from afar, having other things to do. However, I found in my mailbox today compelling testimony by an Israeli woman on what it been going on there.  This half-hour presentation will give you an indication of the nature of the whole proceeding.

As I have written previously, my take is that most of whatever damage there will be has already been done.  63.3% of the world population has been jabbed, with more in the richer countries

Here's a sample of the ongoing battle with fact checkers. 
Fact-checkers, Centers for Disease Control (CDC), and even Pfizer themselves have made attempts to assure the public that the COVID Vaccines do not change or interact with DNA in any way. However, a new study conducted by Swedish researchers proves their claims to be false by finding that messenger RNA (mRNA) from the Pfizer COVID vaccine is able to enter human liver cells and is converted into DNA.

In their paper that was published in Current Issues of Molecular Biology researchers Aldén, et al, from the Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, found that when the mRNA vaccine Comirnaty, enters the human liver cells, it triggers the cell’s DNA which is inside the nucleus, to increase the production of the LINE-1 gene expression to make mRNA.

The mRNA then leaves the nucleus and enters the cell’s cytoplasm, where it translates into LINE-1 protein. A segment of the protein called the open reading frame-1, or ORF-1, then goes back into the nucleus, where it attaches to the vaccine’s mRNA and reverse transcribes into spike DNA.

Reverse transcription is when DNA is made from RNA, whereas the normal transcription process involves a portion of the DNA serving as a template to make an mRNA molecule inside the nucleus (source).

The researchers state that they “offer evidence that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 can enter the human liver cell line Huh7 in vitro, as soon as 6 [hours] after BNT162b2 exposure, BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA.”

Who is right?  The scientists who did the research, or Pfizer and the fact checkers?  The answer is important enough that I'm not going to do as I'm told and simply shut up.

That's the news from Lake WeBeGone, where the men are strong – we need their strength at this moment, the women are good looking, the children are learning (only a bit) to amuse themselves, and the breakfast club is unaware anything is amiss.

Graham