Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Thomas Pierce's avatar

A word about real estate. In rural Indiana, you can buy a modest house for less than $50,000, but the problem is that you probably won't want to live there. Outside Berlin, you can buy a nice house for about $180,000, because the value of rural property is falling. In rural Japan, you can rent a house for $300 a year, and you can buy an abandoned house for less than $100,000. My sister and her husband who live in a leafy small town in Ohio bought a house for $85,000 thirty years ago. Today, that same house is worth about $80,000. In Italy you can buy a house for one Euro is some places. I think it is impossible to predict where the market will go, but one thing for certain is that the population of the world is shrinking and that means less demand for the same amount of land. Some places will always be in demand and the prices will probably remain high, but in other places there is zero demand.

In Japan, if you had bought a modest three bedroom flat in the suburbs of Tokyo in 1989, it would have cost $1 million five hundred thousand dollars. Today that same flat would cost about $150,000. In every year since 1989 the price has fallen. Japan just recently dropped to the third largest economy in the world.

In China today, there are approximately enough apartments and houses for 3 billion people, while the population has begun to shrink and is like 200 million fewer people than the headline number of 1.4 billion people. That means essentially that most apartments, completed or uncompleted, are worth almost nothing. This is the largest Ponzi scheme in human history.

Be careful where you invest. Graham has his money in gold and ETFs. I have US treasuries short term. Nothing else. 5.25%.

Expand full comment
HardeeHo's avatar

My only thought about safe places for money lies in company shares. Gold is interesting, at the moment it's value in USD exceeds inflation considerably. Gold in 1970 was $38, inflation at 8X since then would price Gold at ~$300 but it's ~$2000. XOM in 1970 was ~$0.65 and now is ~$120 (incl dividends) also beating inflation (https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/XOM/exxon/stock-price-history). What's the risk between the two? I suspect a portfolio of decently managed companies will hold value over a long term - with the caveat of decent management. The goal, I think, is to beat inflation which all governments must do because politicians always spend more than revenues.

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts