There are a handful of supposedly independent experts that I am convinced are secretly on Anthony Fauci's payroll. Erik Topol and Katelyn Jetelina are two of them.
Jetelina write as "Your Local Epidemiologist" on twitter, Substack and anyplace else that will have her. Ademas en Español. She uses extremely professional graphics provided, I am sure, at taxpayer expense.
I was seething so badly after reading the post above that I answered it point by point. Substack does not have a good table handling facility, so I am including these images of her article with my comments to the right.
In other news today, Steve Kirsch has an interview with Andrew Wakefield. He is a British doctor who was ejected from the medical community after he started asking uncomfortable questions about vaccines a decade and a half ago when he started to see an alarming incidence of autism and other problems in his vaccinated patients.
You can read Kirsch's summary on Substack or go directly to the video of the interview
That's the news from Lake WeBeGone, where the strong man does his best to defend his family against what Peter and Ginger Breggin call the Global Preditors. They aren't wrong. The good looking woman tolerates this quirk and the oldest child expresses great interest. I'm successful on a small scale.
This morning's post about Justin Bieber, and his wife's, adverse reactions to the vaccine. Presumably. It makes sense, but nobody's talking.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/the-cause-of-justin-biebers-facial?s=r
So I did the first two shots because I had little data and was somewhat at risk. More data arrived mostly via various writers here. Even when I took the jabs, I assessed the risk for those under 50 and in decent health was not high enough to get jabbed given the uncertainly surrounding the mRNA platform. I was well aware of the long history of failure associated with trying to hide RNA from human immune system defenders. As the VAERS data arrived it was becoming obvious that some of us don't tolerate the vaccine well. Worse, we still are not fully aware of the potential long term damage that may be happening among we humans all with unique immune systems.
The promise of the mRNA platform remains great as it has been for some 30-40 years. We will resolve the issues of that technology. The use of it now seems involved in greed and some corruption in our health officials who gain royalty income at the taxpayer's expense. Moderna has no future without the vaccine and Pfizer has been careful about it's risk management.
As you note some of us are helped via re-purposed drugs with a much lower risk profile. Sadly the public has been denied that information. Worse advocates have been treated badly.
Given the immune system diversity in we humans, not all of us will be harmed by the vaccines (I hope). OTOH, we were all never at the same risk of becoming ill. The UK Challenge trials showed nearly half not being infected despite direct efforts to infect them. Not sure why we are not trying to discover how we can avoid getting ill aside from a risky vaccine.