Discussion about this post

User's avatar
streamfortyseven's avatar

Unz has been the US branch of the Duginist Strategic Culture Foundation in this matter from the outset - and other US conservative sites - American Thinker, American Greatness, to name a few - are picking that junk up and repeating it and basing opinions on it. They're the same bunch who have had the wool pulled over their eyes by Dugin's Fourth Political Theory - if they'd read his Foundations of Geopolitics, they'd have an entirely different perspective - or at least I'd hope so.

As to the US role in this, I'm pretty close to where you stand - I think the US set Ukraine up to take a fall, the approach seems to have been "take the money and run" and then cry crocodile tears when Zelensky got removed and the Russians took over after the expected three-day blitzkrieg and fall of the Ky'iv government. Unfortunately for that narrative, Ukraine fought back hard and fought back successfully, and continues to fight back. If that hadn't been the case, I think we'd be looking at a broader war in Europe, starting with the Baltic states, then going down into Poland, then the rest of the old Warsaw Pact, perhaps Austria as well. Now, that appears to be impossible, and it's due to the brave resistance and success of the Ukrainian people. And I think Russia will have to be driven out of Crimea, although after the sinking of the Moskva, that base at Sevastopol may not be such an asset after all - it's definitely in range, and other warships coming out of there - or even at anchor - could meet the same fate - and if I were in charge of a few more cruise missiles, I'd take as many shots as I could which I thought would have a good chance of success at showing that Sevastopol was by no means some sort of "protected anchorage". In any case, any sort of Russian garrison on Crimea would be a threat, and should be eliminated.

As for the organized crime syndicate also known as the Democratic Party - and its weak-kneed semi-opposition (and too often, partner in crime) known as the Republican Party - and the criminal elements in the US National Security State, it's almost worse here than in Ukraine, although we don't quite have oligarchs with private armies - that latter part is played by the CIA and has been from the outset in 1947 (and before that: https://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/warisaracket.html) But these are people that will have to be dealt with in order to restore freedom, in every place where oligarchies and national security states exist - and the one cannot exist without the other. And it's British mercantilism we fought in the Revolutionary War, along with the Crown and its armies. The oligarchs of whatever sort and the national security states are their modern day counterparts, they seek the same goals - personal enrichment through the enslavement of people and the robbery of the fruits of their labor - and accomplish this by unjust and oppressive laws and enforcement by whatever means of the same, whether this be by physical force, psychological manipulation, or both.

Expand full comment
Kit's avatar

Just had a look at the UNZ review.

Apparently, Ukraine is utterly defeated with almost 100% of its armour and helicopters destroyed. Apparently, Ukrainian soldiers are 'Gay Satanic Terrorists'.

Apparently, Ukrainians 'are fighting for the single most Jewish government in the world outside of Israel, which is teaching gay sex and trannyism to their children in kindergarten.'

But not to worry, 'Russia is going to help them get back on their feet. Russia has already committed to that. '

Serious question, have the writers at UNZ actually suffered some sort of mental or emotional breakdown? I'm not being snide, their writing is so divergent from reality that I think this is a matter of psychological concern.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts