Book Report: The Pfizer Documents Analysis. Also - more Russian Percussion: nasty, ineffective confirmation of the need for NATO resolve

20230126

This is a review of an unusual book – the Pfizer Documents Analysis, a look at the material that Pfizer tried to hide for 75 years.  It is incredibly damning evidence.

My interest is the future of the human race, and our European strain of that race.  I am pleased to note that 36 people have seen my related video on The Evolution of What Women Want on Rumble.  On YouTube, where I have 245 followers, another 21 took a look. 

Talking about what women want – and whether their wants include children – I naturally mentioned the drop in fertility occasioned by the Covid jabs.  I chose two of the fifty reports included as chapters in this book to analyze: the effects on pregnant women and on male fertility.  The material on female fertility is spread out more widely.  148,874 of the 923,124 adverse effects reported to Pfizer by women affected their reproductive health in one way or another. 

= = =

In other news today, Putin’s angry response to the news that the NATO powers have agreed on a fairly generous deal to provide Ukraine with tanks was to shower our fair land with rockets all morning.  Winning hearts and minds by cratering more innocent civilians in their apartment buildings.  It underscores NATO’s wisdom in concluding that there is nothing Putin will understand except force, so we had better show him some.

We heard a huge explosion at about 10:00.  Apparently eight of the fifty five missiles got through, one landing in downtown Kyiv.

Back to the book report. Double click the next line to link to Amazon…

War Room / Daily Clout Pfizer Documents Analysis Volunteers Reports Ebook

Was it greed, or is something more sinister afoot?

This book is a series of commentaries on the series of documents that Big Pharma tried hard to bury for 75 years.  The format is, as it must be, a little jumbled.  Material from the Pharma companies and commentary from the Naomi Wolfe / Daily Clout team that analyzed it. 

The book is composed of 50 reports – chapters if you will – with one lead author apiece. 

As the father of young children I have a special interest in their fertility – my grandchildren.  Big Pharma and worldwide governments’ callous disinterest in this question is shocking.  The authors’ own words will be far stronger than my own.  Here are excerpts (with so much dropped text that eclipses would be superfluous) from the chapters on pregnancy and male fertility.

Report 7 – Covid Vaccines and Pregnancy: Risky Business" — Team 1.

To date there have not been any human clinical trials conducted by a COVID-19 vaccine pharmaceutical company to determine if vaccines are safe during pregnancy or while breastfeeding. All Emergency Use Authorizations (EUA's) exclude pregnant women and no COVID-19 vaccine has been approved for use during pregnancy. Astonishingly, however, many professional medical organizations have strongly advocated for their use during pregnancy despite the lack of any safety data.

So we see that their confidence in the safety of the Pfizer vaccine is based solely on animal studies. Given the extreme importance of studying the effects of a new vaccine technology on pregnant women and their offspring; one would expect this study to be conducted by independent researchers using a robust design that answers fundamental questions. Questions like were there any congenital abnormalities or developmental issues in the offspring and were there any long-term effects on fertility?

After a review of this study, it is astounding to discover that it was performed on a mere 44 rats and for a length of only 42 days!

They observed disturbing evidence of dramatic increases in serious medical conditions among military personnel in 2021, correlating directly with the roll out of COVID-19 vaccines. Among the numerous conditions listed are congenital malformations.

The rise in congenital malformations increased dramatically from a baseline rate of 10,906 cases per year, to 18,951 for only part of the year in 2021. 

In layman's terms the NIH is saying that they strongly suggest that pregnant women be vaccinated for COVID-19 based upon the recommendation of "expert opinion" from groups such as ACOG and SMFM alone, not based on any reliable evidence from one or more randomized trials without major limitations.

Report 37: Pfizer, FDA, CDC Hid Proven  Harms to Male Sperm Quality, Testes Function,  from mRNA Vaccine Ingredients

Pfizer's own documents and other medical studies show:

1. mRNA vaccine ingredients can be transferred from one person to another via skin-to-skin contact, inhalation and via "sexual intercourse," through bodily fluids. That is to say, vaccine "shedding" can occur via sexual contact, including via exposure to semen

2. Pfizer did not test "male reproductive toxicity". Male reproductive toxicity is defined as adverse effects (negative impacts) related to sexual function and fertility in adult male

3. Pfizer also did not test for adverse effects from vaccinated men's semen, on the development of their offspring.

6. mRNA vaccine ingredients travel throughout the body and gather in organs, including in the testes

7. mRNA vaccines resulting in "anti-sperm antibodies" - that is to say, antibodies that treat sperm as an "invader", and damage or kill it - is a known adverse event related to this form of vaccination.

10. mRNA vaccines cause a staggering drop in semen concentration and total motile count.

"Male participants are eligible to participate if they agree to the following requirements during the intervention period and for at least 28 days after the last dose of study intervention, which corresponds to the time needed to eliminate reproductive safety risk of the study intervention(s)"

• Refrain from donating sperm.

• Abstain from heterosexual intercourse with a female of childbearing potential as their preferred and usual lifestyle.

But when Pfizer eventually did look at the mRNA vaccine's impact on male fertility, the company used "untreated male" rats for its "Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity" studies. The untreated males mated with female rats that had been dosed with BNT162b2, Pfizer's mRNA vaccine.

In other words, Pfizer tested fertility effects on female mammals dosed with its mRNA product but left the males undosed.  Throughout the Pfizer documents, the issue arises that studies were constructed so that Pfizer (and the FDA) did not find what it chose not to look for.

"NPs [nanoparticles] can pass through the blood-testis barrier... then accumulate in reproductive organs. NP accumulation damages organs (testis, epididymis...) by destroying Sertoli cells, Leydig cells, and germ cells, causing reproductive organ dysfunction that adversely affects sperm quality, quantity, morphology, and motility..."? [

·   The "epididymis" is involved in transporting sperm from the testes.·    

·    Sertoli cells" are vital to the development of the testes. "Sertoli cells are of critical importance for testis development...[and] are the master regulators of testis development..."·     

·    "Leydig cells" are present in the testicular interstitial tissue. Their main function is to produce testosterone for the maintenance of sperm creation and development and male body development.·     

·    "Germ cells" "are...precursors of... sperm cells.

The authors conclude

1.     lipid nanoparticles gather in human organs including the testes,

2.     nanoparticles are detrimental to normal male reproduction, and

3.     Big Pharma and public health agencies knowingly gambled with harms to boys' and male teens' sexual development, and with all ages of males' testosterone levels, older males' sperm counts, and male fertility.    

Note that Pfizer knew about this male infertility AESI almost 12 months prior to the clearly false NIH statement from February of 2022: "COVID-19 vaccination does not reduce chances of conception..."

Contrary to established medical ethics, Pfizer and public health agencies did not disclose the true impacts of mRNA gene therapy vaccines on male fertility and, thus, as noted above, denied men informed consent.

That concludes a brief example of the contents of the book.  It is clear that these companies have no ethics whatsoever.  Whether the behavior documented here was merely slipshod, in an attempt to get rich quick, or there is a more sinister agenda of depopulation is something readers must work out for themselves.