Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Thomas Pierce's avatar

It's amazing how many people were frightened by the AIDS thing. Since I lived in Santa Cruz, an active suburb of gay San Francisco, I knew guys who were contracting AIDS and I started investigating. There was no Internet then, so it took some years. By the time it hit the main stream press, I knew already that it was a disease limited to zip codes. I can thank Celia Farber for this information because her writing in SPIN magazine was the best material on the subject to my knowledge. I am sure that she was the one writing the articles about zip codes. In other words, it was a disease of two groups, if it was a disease at all, needle users and male homosexuals.

I remember one night watching Nightline, with Ted Koppel, as he interviewed two scientists from the CDC. He was trying as hard as possible to get them to say that AIDS was a disease rampant in all segments of society. In fact, they resisted and told the truth. AIDS was largely restricted to two groups as noted above. It was not a heterosexual disease.

When the mainstream press started its fear campaign about AIDS, I was already convinced that there was nothing for me personally to worry about. I still remember an article from the San Francisco Chronicle. The headline read that AIDS was up 40% in heterosexual women in the Bay Area. I read until the second to last paragraph which gave the actual statistics. There had been three cases of AIDS among heterosexual women in 1983, but in 1984 there were five cases, an increase of 40%. You see, it wasn't a lie. AIDS was getting worse and affecting heterosexual women.

A few years later, I had an opportunity to speak to a man who worked for the CDC. I had to ask him why the government was lying about AIDS, because it wasn't true what they were saying in public. It was no surprise to him, and he told me what the justification was for all the lies coming from the CDC. There was a significant rise of STDs among young people since the 70s because of the era of free love, but young people were not afraid of the standard STDs, like gonorrhea and chlamydia. But they were afraid of AIDS. Thus, the use of the fear campaign was justified if it stopped rampant sexual behavior.

Expand full comment
HardeeHo's avatar

I suspect the drugs, multiple partners in unprotected sex has much to do with AIDS. The various one night stands we may have engaged in were not likely to be that dangerous, protected or not.

Excess mortality worldwide follows vaccine usage. And Malone notes heart issues in young males harms them for life. Turns out rushing towards a imperfect savior hasn't been wise. Pity we couldn't have started with the GBD, we might have been safer in the end.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts