8 Comments
User's avatar
HardeeHo's avatar

Trump seems to walk a fine line about Ukraine and has found a lane. Still I had hoped for a huge munitions capacity order that might influence Russia. Sad that fools like Tucker decided an issue poorly informed. But Trump smart to walk that line.

John Fitzgerald's avatar

Trump can't be trusted at all

Ukraine is in trouble. I hope you and yours get through unscathed

EyeOnMadisonStreet's avatar

I believe this will be the first article I've proffered for your attention. I know it checks at least three of your interest boxes: war, human intelligence and technology. What really caught my eye and made it seem a good catch for you was the reference to "Prolog III code". Whatever that is, it sounds like it's in your wheelhouse. https://turcopolier.com/apple-calls-bullshit-on-the-ai-revolution/#comment-247533

Graham Seibert's avatar

I'm watching the market sort this out. NVDA lost a half trillion dollars (!) in market cap yesterday. Thanks for the link - it echoes a couple of others I have seen.

stretch23's avatar

Always enjoy your perspectives. Here is an interesting perspective on "toxic femininity" that I think you might enjoy. Anglin is of course ostracized by all respectable people, but he frequently makes a lot of sense.

https://www.unz.com/aanglin/toxic-femininity-manifest-as-political-tyranny/

Graham Seibert's avatar

NO! That is the article I was going to write today. Amazing!

stretch23's avatar

Must be a zeitgeist thing. How about a review/response?

Graham Seibert's avatar

I'm composing a Toastmasters speech. The ladies who run the club constantly tell me not to be so controversial. IE, don't express my versions of the truth about global warming, homosexual predation on boys, transgender, male-female differences, racial differences etc.

The speech as I envision it now is simply a seven-minute explanation of Haidt's five moral foundations. I will simply note who embraces only the individual foundations (care and fairness) and who also considers the group foundations (authority, loyalty, and purity/sanctity). And how these foundations can be in conflict with one another.

This should be rather anodyne. I have another in mind about children. Liberals cannot afford to say they don't like my having children - which they don't. Instead they busy themselves with telling me how to raise them. I want to raise them to pass on their bloodline and their culture. That's what they hate, and go out of their way to frustrate.

If and when I do, I'll post the speeches on Rumble, with links here.