Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Grow Food's avatar

I prefer the German New Medicine view of cancer: it is a healing mechanism and should not be feared nor fought. For example, Lung Cancer, the proliferation of lung cells: Your lungs are adding cells to increase the capacity to breathe! Once the crisis has passed and you are in the healing phase, your body will break down the extra cells. This metabolic activity, when detected by the industry, is called malignant. How sad - the person is in the healing stage when they are told they are dying. Why do people get lung cancer after they quit smoking? Their lungs are healing...the "cancer" is like a scab. My sister has been working with off-label drugs for her brain tumor. They put her on a statin (one of the most dangerous drugs out there) an insulin regulator (for someone that doesn't have diabetes) a heavy antibiotic (a huge problem for someone with leaky gut) and everyone's favorite: an antiparasitic drug. But of course, only after having chemo and radiation (no one will ever tell you to leave those out). She suffered significant brain damage from the chemo and radiation (as expected) and is now struggling to heal the brain damage - forget the tumor. It hasn't changed, hasn't caused any damage and they said it has probably been there for 30 years. Why mess with it now?? I do think these other therapies are less harmful than chemo and radiation but I do not think they are without side effects. I think their only positive outcomes would be for those that avoid traditional methods (or more rounds of them) to try these new ones. It seems that cancer TREATMENTS are the leading cause of death, not cancer itself.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts